Wichita State
Men - Women
2012 - 2013 - 2014
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
459  Samantha Shukla SR 20:53
561  Ebeissa Nyandwi JR 21:03
767  Sidney Hirsch FR 21:17
1,233  Kaitlyn McLeod JR 21:48
1,342  Emily Hornbeck SO 21:55
1,501  Kayla Deighan SO 22:04
1,649  Savannah Wright SO 22:13
2,035  Laura Burke SR 22:38
2,711  Sarah Wright 23:24
2,901  Elida Bailon SR 23:41
3,299  Megan Ballinger FR 24:34
3,483  Julia Stafford JR 25:15
National Rank #135 of 340
Midwest Region Rank #18 of 36
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 16th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.1%
Top 10 in Regional 2.1%
Top 20 in Regional 95.7%


Race Performance Ratings



Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.



RaceDateTeam Rating Samantha Shukla Ebeissa Nyandwi Sidney Hirsch Kaitlyn McLeod Emily Hornbeck Kayla Deighan Savannah Wright Laura Burke Sarah Wright Elida Bailon Megan Ballinger
Bill Dellinger Invitational 10/05 1139 20:57 21:14 21:08 21:09 21:54 22:08 22:05 22:33
Bradley Classic 10/18 1168 20:57 21:09 21:20 22:06 21:40 22:06 22:26 23:23 23:41 24:34
Missouri Valley Championships 11/02 1125 20:47 20:52 21:26 21:40 22:18 22:14 22:38 23:25
Midwest Region Championships 11/15 1148 20:52 20:59 21:15 22:15 22:07 22:38 23:12





NCAA Tournament Simulation



Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.




Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 16.1 450 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.4 0.4 1.1 1.1 3.0 5.6 10.3 18.6 18.9 15.1 10.6 6.4 4.2 2.5 1.0 0.4 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Samantha Shukla 45.6 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.9 0.8 0.8
Ebeissa Nyandwi 59.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2
Sidney Hirsch 82.3 0.0
Kaitlyn McLeod 125.6
Emily Hornbeck 136.6
Kayla Deighan 149.0
Savannah Wright 162.3




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 0.0% 0.0 4
5 0.1% 0.1 5
6 0.0% 0.0 6
7 0.1% 0.1 7
8 0.4% 0.4 8
9 0.4% 0.4 9
10 1.1% 1.1 10
11 1.1% 1.1 11
12 3.0% 3.0 12
13 5.6% 5.6 13
14 10.3% 10.3 14
15 18.6% 18.6 15
16 18.9% 18.9 16
17 15.1% 15.1 17
18 10.6% 10.6 18
19 6.4% 6.4 19
20 4.2% 4.2 20
21 2.5% 2.5 21
22 1.0% 1.0 22
23 0.4% 0.4 23
24 0.1% 0.1 24
25 0.0% 0.0 25
26 0.1% 0.1 26
27 0.0% 0.0 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points




At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.




Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0